Agenda and minutes

Venue: Virtual Meeting. View directions

Contact: Emma Bryer  01267 224029

Items
No. Item

1.

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Minutes:

There were no apologies for absence.

2.

DECLARATIONS OF PERSONAL INTEREST

Minutes:

There were no declarations of personal interest.

3.

MINUTES

3.1

21ST OCTOBER, 2021 [10:00 A.M] pdf icon PDF 275 KB

Minutes:

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 21st October 2021 (10:00a.m.) be signed as a correct record.

3.2

21ST OCTOBER, 2021 [10:10 A.M] pdf icon PDF 188 KB

Minutes:

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 21st October 2021 (10:10a.m.) be signed as a correct record.

3.3

21ST OCTOBER, 2021 [10:30 A.M] pdf icon PDF 186 KB

Minutes:

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 21st October 2021 (10:30a.m.) be signed as a correct record.

3.4

21ST OCTOBER, 2021 [10:40 A.M] pdf icon PDF 273 KB

Minutes:

RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 21st October 2021 (10:40a.m.) be signed as a correct record.

4.

EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

THE REPORT RELATING TO THE FOLLOWING ITEM IS NOT FOR PUBLICATION AS IT CONTAINS  EXEMPT INFORMATION AS DEFINED IN PARAGRAPH 12 OF PART 4 OF SCHEDULE 12A TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT, 1972 AS AMENDED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT (ACCESS TO INFORMATION) (VARIATION) (WALES) ORDER 2007.

 

IF FOLLOWING THE APPLICATION OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST TEST THE PANEL RESOLVES PURSUANT TO THE ACT TO CONSIDER THIS  ITEM IN PRIVATE, THE PUBLIC WILL BE EXCLUDED FROM THE MEETING DURING SUCH CONSIDERATION

Minutes:

UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED, pursuant to the Local Government Act 1972, as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) (Wales) Order 2007, that the public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following item as the report contained exempt information as defined in paragraph 12 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A to the Act.

5.

TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL BY APPLICANT M.D. AGAINST A DECISION BY OFFICERS FOR THE NON-PROVISION OF FREE SCHOOL TRANSPORT.

Minutes:

Following the application of the public interest test it was UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED pursuant to the Act referred to in minute 4 above, not to publicise the content of the report as it contained exempt information relating to a particular individual. The public interest test in this matter related to the fact that the report included personal information relating to the applicant. Disclosure would support transparency and accountability in the decision-making process, however, on balance the public interest in maintaining confidentiality outweighed the public interest in disclosure because of the need to protect the identity of the applicant and the family.

 

The Panel considered the written representations of the appellant in respect of the refusal of the Stage 1 Review Panel to grant M.D. free school transport to a school which was not the nearest or LEA designated school for the home address and therefore, did not meet the criteria outlined in the Council’s policy for the provision of assistance.

 

The Panel considered the individual circumstances of the case, together with the observations of the departmental officers.

 

RESOLVED, in line with the Authority’s Home to School Transport Policy, that the appeal be refused on the basis that M.D. was not attending the nearest or Local Education Authority designated school for the home address, due to parental preference.

6.

TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL BY APPLICANT K.D. AGAINST A DECISION BY OFFICERS FOR THE NON-PROVISION OF FREE SCHOOL TRANSPORT.

Minutes:

Following the application of the public interest test it was UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED pursuant to the Act referred to in minute 4 above, not to publicise the content of the report as it contained exempt information relating to a particular individual. The public interest test in this matter related to the fact that the report included personal information relating to the applicant. Disclosure would support transparency and accountability in the decision-making process, however, on balance the public interest in maintaining confidentiality outweighed the public interest in disclosure because of the need to protect the identity of the applicant and the family.

 

The Panel considered the written representations of the appellant in respect of the refusal of the Stage 1 Review Panel to grant K.D. free school transport to a school which was not the nearest or LEA designated school for the home address and therefore, did not meet the criteria outlined in the Council’s policy for the provision of assistance.

 

The Panel considered the individual circumstances of the case, together with the observations of the departmental officers.

 

UNANIMOUSLY RESOLVED, in line with the Authority’s Home to School Transport Policy, that the appeal be refused on the basis that K.D. was not attending the nearest or Local Education Authority designated school for the home address, due to parental preference.

 

Council & Democracy

The Council

Councillors, AMs and MPs

Council departments

Have your say

Committees & Meetings

Strategies and plans